CONTACT Since Time Began CONTACT
SOVEREIGN NATION STATES ___________ CHANCELLOR OF LAWS ___________ SOVEREIGN NATION STATES
SOVEREIGN NATION STATES ___________ CHANCELLOR OF LAWS ___________ SOVEREIGN NATION STATES
The Following Is Submitted Implementing Financial Figures From Public Sources
FMV (3.5 Million CANOE Peoples Victims x $1.5 Million per Victim = $5.3 Trillion) FMV
CANOE OPTIONAL SETTLEMENT OFFER
FMV (3.5 Million CANOE Peoples Victims x $1.5 Million per Victim = $5.3 Trillion) FMV
CANOE OPTIONAL SETTLEMENT OFFER
The Fair Market Valuations [FMV] are derived through calculations arising from contracts between CANOE Peoples and the SHIP Crown Canada since before 1923; and, in most particular, compensation settlement values in cases of abuse of both CANOE children and SHIP children at behest of church organizations in Canada and the United States since 1995. The last Indian Residential School was closed in 1996. Today, 60% of penal inmates in Canada are CANOE Peoples. And, 60% of CANOE children seized into SHIP custody are placed with non-CANOE Peoples. The SHIP Crown Canada refers to CANOE agreements as being nation-to-nation - no CANOE-SHIP treaty is registered at the UN as required by the UN Charter. Energy valuations of land resources are derived from specific Power Purchase Agreements between the CANOE & the SHIP in 1990. Traditionally, CANOE children abuse settlements are only 10% of similar settlements achieved for SHIP children abuse settlements. The Supreme Court of Crown Canada values property on "Indian reserves" as being 10% of similar SHIP properties. 60% of the circa annual $9 Billion AANDC [Indian Affairs] budget goes to non-CANOE Peoples consultants. The average CANOE family support annual stipend is <$15,000 for a family of average 6-8 members. At the 2009 Inter-American Commission on Human Rights Hearings for the HTG 2-million acres land titles claim against Crown Canada; Lawyers Rights Watch and Amnesty International filed supporting friendly [amicus curaie] briefs; alleging the historical nature of CANOE Peoples' court applications in Crown Canada established a pattern of taking 20-30 years to wind its way through the judicial system; costing the CANOE circa average $40-Million; and, then, the Crown Canada simply ignored the court decisions.
This CANOE claim settlement will strike out to achieve FMV of financial compensation settlement; as well as seeking international War Crimes Tribunal intervention against SHIP principals.
The $6-Trillion Claim is based upon FMV as arising through existing inventoried assets under the current claim of Crown Canada; and, doe snot include the Elizabeth II Crown Jewels under custody of the United Kingdom; and, or, under her personal or family claim.
The CANOE claim against the SHIP arises through the specific colonization and sustained military occupation by Parties originating from the United Kingdom / Britain and the British Commonwealth. Specifically, the fraternal organization known as The Firm is to be held in the responding Joint-and-Several Compact.
In the matter of Crown Canada legal counsel representing "Indian Residential Schools Victims Survivors". There is obvious evident bias against the best interests of the client CANOE Peoples from the outset. These lawyers, adjudicators, record keepers being citizens of the SHIP Crown Canada. Further, it is apparent from public and private records - including, but, not limited to the 1996 Canada Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples and the current Canada Truth & Reconciliation Commission records and reports, that there is continued negative bias against providing the global FMV settlement to CANOE victims - in fact, only 10% of SHIP victims settlements were used as the gauging criteria in the matter of CANOE victims.
On additions. lawyers commanded circa 40-45% of CANOE victims' settlements as a Fee-for-Service [FFS] before they would provide CANOE victims with their compensation; and, then, certain lawyers were additionally commanding that CANOE victim clients give them works of art.
It is the reputation of the circa 1900 SHIPS' Crown Canada lawyers, who "represented" CANOE victims, additionally received FFS payments of 10-15% of CANOE victim settlements. Double dipping; and, extending the issue of evident bias contrary to the CANOE victims' interests.
There is no evidence that the circa 1900 "lawyers" advised these CANOE victim clients of their rights within customary laws or international laws : i.e, Free Prior Informed Consent; absence of treaties granting SHIP Crown Canada legal jurisdiction as the governing body; no evidence of counseling on the matters of the Universal Doctrines of Fundamental human Rights; the UN Charter, Chapter VII dictums against the SHIP Crown Canada; the CANOE Peoples allodial title rights as paramount to the Hudson's Bay Company Charter; or, the bequest of "Ruperts Land" by Charles II.
Nor, is there any evident legal counsel to the CANOE Peoples / victims of the limitations of the Royal Proclamation of 1763; i.e., not applicable in Turtle Island North / Canada. The failures of lawyers in their duty of care to their CANOE victim clients justifies a claim against them under the provisions of Crimes Against Humanity. International legal counsel is under review on these matters, with regard to submitting CANOE Peoples' clams briefs to the International Crimes Against Humanity Tribunal Officer.
Therein, the following FMV Charts illustrate the CANOE Peoples veracity and just / good cause $6-Trillion USD Settlement Claim. The CANOE Peoples' entitlements arising through this $6T Claim creates the CANOE Environment Protection Fund; through which CANOE stewardship of governance and economic development of natural resources will fall under the parameters of paramount CANOE stewardship - THIS is NOT CONSULTATION; it is absolute CANOE REGULATION through justice procedures; as enshrined within Peace Trust Friendship / Gus Wen Tah / Two Row Wampum.
This CANOE claim settlement will strike out to achieve FMV of financial compensation settlement; as well as seeking international War Crimes Tribunal intervention against SHIP principals.
The $6-Trillion Claim is based upon FMV as arising through existing inventoried assets under the current claim of Crown Canada; and, doe snot include the Elizabeth II Crown Jewels under custody of the United Kingdom; and, or, under her personal or family claim.
The CANOE claim against the SHIP arises through the specific colonization and sustained military occupation by Parties originating from the United Kingdom / Britain and the British Commonwealth. Specifically, the fraternal organization known as The Firm is to be held in the responding Joint-and-Several Compact.
In the matter of Crown Canada legal counsel representing "Indian Residential Schools Victims Survivors". There is obvious evident bias against the best interests of the client CANOE Peoples from the outset. These lawyers, adjudicators, record keepers being citizens of the SHIP Crown Canada. Further, it is apparent from public and private records - including, but, not limited to the 1996 Canada Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples and the current Canada Truth & Reconciliation Commission records and reports, that there is continued negative bias against providing the global FMV settlement to CANOE victims - in fact, only 10% of SHIP victims settlements were used as the gauging criteria in the matter of CANOE victims.
On additions. lawyers commanded circa 40-45% of CANOE victims' settlements as a Fee-for-Service [FFS] before they would provide CANOE victims with their compensation; and, then, certain lawyers were additionally commanding that CANOE victim clients give them works of art.
It is the reputation of the circa 1900 SHIPS' Crown Canada lawyers, who "represented" CANOE victims, additionally received FFS payments of 10-15% of CANOE victim settlements. Double dipping; and, extending the issue of evident bias contrary to the CANOE victims' interests.
There is no evidence that the circa 1900 "lawyers" advised these CANOE victim clients of their rights within customary laws or international laws : i.e, Free Prior Informed Consent; absence of treaties granting SHIP Crown Canada legal jurisdiction as the governing body; no evidence of counseling on the matters of the Universal Doctrines of Fundamental human Rights; the UN Charter, Chapter VII dictums against the SHIP Crown Canada; the CANOE Peoples allodial title rights as paramount to the Hudson's Bay Company Charter; or, the bequest of "Ruperts Land" by Charles II.
Nor, is there any evident legal counsel to the CANOE Peoples / victims of the limitations of the Royal Proclamation of 1763; i.e., not applicable in Turtle Island North / Canada. The failures of lawyers in their duty of care to their CANOE victim clients justifies a claim against them under the provisions of Crimes Against Humanity. International legal counsel is under review on these matters, with regard to submitting CANOE Peoples' clams briefs to the International Crimes Against Humanity Tribunal Officer.
Therein, the following FMV Charts illustrate the CANOE Peoples veracity and just / good cause $6-Trillion USD Settlement Claim. The CANOE Peoples' entitlements arising through this $6T Claim creates the CANOE Environment Protection Fund; through which CANOE stewardship of governance and economic development of natural resources will fall under the parameters of paramount CANOE stewardship - THIS is NOT CONSULTATION; it is absolute CANOE REGULATION through justice procedures; as enshrined within Peace Trust Friendship / Gus Wen Tah / Two Row Wampum.
